“The SWOT analysis is for the inexperienced” is what a MBA professor exclaimed in a business strategy course I took a while ago. I, along with my fellow students, were astonished to hear that statement. I mean, really. We all thought the SWOT analysis was a golden tool to help build strategy. We tried to convince the professor to change his mind on the SWOT tool. But the professor held firm on his statement.
A SWOT analysis is a common strategic planning tool that identifies an organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Ultimately the goal of this tool is to help identify internal and external factors that might impede or support key objectives.
At the start of every year, planning for the near term and future, is usually top of mind for the C-Suite, HR executives, leadership, and board members. Planning sessions are no doubt on many upcoming meeting agendas. More often than not, the SWOT analysis will show up as one of the agenda items.
It turns out the professor I spoke about earlier made some valid points. Don’t get me wrong. This is not about dismissing the SWOT analysis. But instead this is about expanding our thinking as opposed to just sticking to a “common think box” of what is most popular. There is various strategy planning methods. When it comes to objectives such as obtaining a competitive advantage, the right strategy and effective execution is a key to success. So it stands to reason that we must utilize strategy planning methods up front that are most effective.
Here is a high level overview of three strategy-planning methods:
The SWOT Analysis – The SWOT analysis as stated above is a tool that emphasizes the consideration of an organization’s strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The SWOT analysis is applied in non-profit and for-profit settings. It is utilized for organization-wide or individual based analysis. Marketing discipline may also use this tool to assess competitors.
The advantage of the SWOT (or “WOTS up” in some circles): “One of the greatest advantages of SWOT analysis is that it helps to summarize and clarify whatever opportunities and issues are facing a business or project” (Uhl). It is a tool that provides a simple structure to identifying areas that can impede or propel objectives.
A disadvantage is that the tool is considered too simplistic in nature and doesn’t account for complexities such as to what degree the strengths and weaknesses exist. More research is required to learn to what level are issues and opportunities. An organization, department or individual may be weak in something, but it may not be to the degree that it would undermine objectives. So putting resources on something identified, could be a waste and better served on other key strategies.
Scenario Planning – "Scenario planning is a discipline for rediscovering the original entrepreneurial power of creative foresight in contexts of accelerated change, greater complexity, and genuine uncertainty" (Wack.) Scenario Planning is a strategic planning method that sets a flexible path for long term planning. This process seeks to answer the question, “What if?” From that point, decision makers can consider developing strategies to address each possible scenario. “Scenario Thinking, introduced by Shell Group Planning in the 1970s, has evolved as a powerful methodology to enable groups to structurally anticipate change and incorporate external uncertainty into the internal decision making process.
The advantage of scenario planning is that it can be a powerful tool in deciding course of action especially in times of uncertainty. This tool will help give some insight in when to advance and when to retreat in a strategy plan given a particular scenario.
Disadvantages to this method are time spent and ambiguity. Just imagine how many possible scenarios your organization faces today that could possibly impact objectives. Now sit down and talk about them. Okay now decide which scenario is imminent and which will likely occur 5-10 years from now. How do you know? This exercise will most likely going to take more than just a simple 1 hour meeting and certain the need to validate before investing in decisions made.
Distinctive Competencies – Distinctive Competencies, also known as core competence analysis, identifies what it is your organization does better than anyone else. An assessment of the internal and external environment helps to determine strengths. Once a strength is identified that will meet market needs and delivers a competitive advantage that becomes an organization’s core competency. What gets real interesting about this strategy is determining future core competence.
Helping organizations identify strategies around building new or strengthening existing resources and capabilities is a definite advantage to this method. Ultimately this method could propel an organization’s ability to compete in a global and local marketplace.
Regardless of strategy or strategic planning, there are critical risks if key decision makers lose sight of consumer's identity and view of value. Especially if the blinders go on in favor of chasing the next flashy thing. Consumers are quick to voice satisfaction, or dissatisfaction, with their wallets.
Of course several there are other strategy methods such as issues and value based assessments, and Porter's Five Forces. Ultimately each strategy planning method holds value. But which one to use depends on the organization’s objectives, planning history, culture, and environment. In some cases a hybrid approach to planning where “one size don’t not fit all” may be the best planning method.
What are your experiences with strategic planning? Which method do you use or have found most helpful?
Latest posts by Tresha Moreland (see all)
- A Warm Christmas Message: Wishing You the Best This Holiday Season - December 23, 2024
- The Road Less Traveled: Lessons from Non-Traditional Career Paths - December 22, 2024
- The Ripple Effect: How Small Leadership Habits Create Big Cultural Shifts - December 21, 2024
