Spread the love

Picture this: a high-powered executive at JPMorgan Chase struts into the office, freshly pressed suit and all, and declares to the team, “I need more hustle!” The return-to-office mandate has landed, desks are buzzing again, and the expectation is clear—energy, output, results. Meanwhile, across the country, the new White House administration is scratching its head, peering into the sprawling federal workforce, and asking each employee to jot down a tidy five-bullet list of what they accomplished last week. Two worlds, private and public, both zeroing in on the same nagging question: Are we getting enough bang for our buck? Welcome to the invisible productivity conundrum—a puzzle where effort’s loud, output’s murky, and the line between hustle and hoopla keeps getting blurrier.

We’ve all felt it—that itch to know if our work works. Leaders want proof their teams are firing on all cylinders; employees want to feel their grind adds up to something real. But here’s the kicker: productivity isn’t a trophy you can polish and plop on a shelf. It’s a ghost—slipping through metrics, dodging spreadsheets, and laughing at our attempts to pin it down. As offices refill and governments tighten the reins, this conundrum’s front and center: How do we measure what matters when so much of it stays unseen?

The Hustle Hype Meets the Accountability Ask

Let’s start with the JPMorgan exec. “More hustle” sounds like a locker-room pep talk—grit your teeth, push harder, make it happen. It’s the kind of call that thrives in a bustling office, where you can see the late-night lights, hear the caffeinated chatter, and feel the pulse of a team in motion. The return-to-office push isn’t just about real estate—it’s about reviving that tangible buzz, the belief that proximity juices productivity. And it’s not unique to banking giants; companies everywhere are betting that face-time sparks something remote screens can’t.

Now pivot to the White House. A new administration, eager to streamline, demands federal employees distill their week into five crisp bullet points. It’s less “hustle” and more “show me”—a plea for visibility into a workforce often caricatured as a faceless bureaucracy. Where the exec wants sweat, the administration wants clarity—proof that tax dollars aren’t vanishing into a void of vague tasks. Both are chasing the same ghost: productivity’s true shape. But here’s where it gets thorny—hustle doesn’t always equal output, and bullet points don’t always capture value.

The Invisible Work Trap

Think about your own day. Maybe you spent an hour troubleshooting a client’s glitch, saving a deal no one’ll ever flag as a “win.” Or you coached a newbie through a process, planting seeds for their future star turn—good luck bullet-pointing that. This is the invisible work trap: the stuff that keeps the machine humming but rarely makes the highlight reel. In an office, hustle might look like a flurry of meetings and desk dashes—impressive, sure, but is it moving the needle? At home, remote workers might churn out reports in silence, no fanfare, yet nail the goal. Which one’s “productive”?

The conundrum deepens with scale. Federal employees—think air traffic controllers, policy analysts, park rangers—often juggle sprawling, slow-burn missions. One week’s haul might be “drafted a memo” or “inspected a trail”—small potatoes on paper, seismic in context. A JPMorgan trader, meanwhile, might close a million-dollar deal in an afternoon, ticker tape practically flying. The outputs differ wildly, but the effort? The impact? That’s where the invisible sneaks in. We’re wired to cheer the loud wins—the signed contracts, the ribbon-cuttings—but the quiet glue, the prep, the maintenance? It’s productivity’s unsung hero, and it’s a devil to measure.

The Metrics Mirage

So, we slap metrics on it—KPIs, quotas, those five little bullets. JPMorgan might track trades per hour; the White House might tally forms processed or calls fielded. Numbers feel solid, scientific—proof we’re not just spinning wheels. But here’s the mirage: metrics lie. They spotlight what’s easy to count, not what’s essential. A trader hustling to rack up deals might miss a market shift a slower peer catches. A federal worker padding their list with “attended meeting” might skip the unglamorous grunt work that actually matters—say, double-checking a safety reg.

This isn’t new. Back in the ‘90s, management guru Peter Drucker warned about “activity traps”—busyness masquerading as progress. Hustle’s the poster child: it’s loud, it’s visible, it’s something. But stack it against results, and the cracks show. One study from a major consulting firm found 70% of employees feel their best work goes unnoticed—why? Because it’s not the stuff that fits neatly into a box. The White House’s bullet-list gambit risks the same trap: five lines might dazzle, but do they tell the story? A park ranger’s “cleaned a trail” doesn’t scream “stopped a wildfire”—yet it might’ve.

The Flexibility Factor

Now toss hybrid work into the mix. JPMorgan’s office revival assumes hustle thrives in person—collisions at the coffee machine, whiteboards ablaze. Fair point: some magic does happen face-to-face—ideas ping-pong, trust builds. But flexibility’s flipped the script. Remote workers, unshackled from commutes, often churn out more in less time—one Stanford study pegged a 13% productivity bump for telecommuters. So why the “more hustle” cry? Maybe it’s less about output and more about control—seeing the effort, feeling the grind.

The federal side’s trickier. A sprawling workforce—some in cubicles, some in forests—can’t all hustle the same way. Flexibility’s baked in: a policy wonk might thrive remote, drafting briefs in peace, while a border agent’s got no choice but boots on the ground. The White House’s list demand assumes uniformity, but reality’s messier. An agile leader knows this—flexibility isn’t the enemy of productivity; it’s the ally. The conundrum? Proving it. Remote wins might outpace office hustle, but without the theater of effort, they stay invisible.

Cracking the Conundrum: A New Playbook

So how do we solve this? How do we see the unseen, reward the real, and ditch the hustle-for-hustle’s-sake trap? It’s not about more metrics or louder cheers—it’s about rethinking the game.

  • Focus on Outcomes, Not Optics: JPMorgan’s exec might swap “hustle” for “impact”—what moved the needle, not who looked busiest. The White House could nudge employees to link bullets to bigger wins—“memo drafted” becomes “policy gap closed.” It’s harder to track, sure, but it cuts through the noise.
  • Spotlight the Shadows: Invisible work needs a megaphone. Leaders can call out the glue—thank the troubleshooter, toast the mentor. HR can weave it into reviews: “What’d you fix that no one saw?” One tech firm I know started “quiet hero” nods—productivity spiked.
  • Flex the Frame: Hybrid’s here to stay—lean in. Let teams pick their hustle spot—office for sparks, home for grind—and judge by results. A federal analyst might bullet-point “researched X” from a cabin; a trader might close deals in a skyscraper. Fit the mode to the mission.
  • Ask, Don’t Assume: The White House’s list is a start—now dig deeper. “What blocked you?” “What’s unseen but vital?” JPMorgan could pulse-check: “Where’s hustle helping—or hurting?” Answers beat guesses.
  • Embrace the Mess: Productivity’s not a straight line—it’s a squiggle. Agile leaders roll with it—some weeks dazzle, some simmer. Trust the process, not the polish.

The Payoff: Beyond the Conundrum

Crack this, and the rewards ripple. Teams freed from hustle theater dig into real work—less show, more substance. Leaders stop chasing ghosts and start steering ships—JPMorgan hits targets, federal missions land. Morale climbs when effort’s seen—not just the loud stuff, but the quiet wins that stitch it all together. One study pegged high-trust teams at 50% more output—visibility’s the spark.

Miss it, and you’re stuck—hustling in circles, bullet-pointing busywork, wondering why the needle won’t budge. The invisible productivity conundrum isn’t a curse—it’s a challenge. Leaders who face it head-on, who value the unseen over the obvious, don’t just adapt—they redefine the game. So next time the exec barks “more hustle” or the administration demands five lines, pause. Ask: What’s really moving us forward? The answer’s there—not in the noise, but in the shadows. That’s where the real work lives—and where the conundrum cracks wide open.

The following two tabs change content below.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy LinkedIn profile

Tresha Moreland

Tresha Moreland is a 30-year organizational effectiveness and strategic workforce planning expert. She partners with business leaders to develop workplace strategies that achieve best-in-class results. She has held key organizational leadership roles in multiple industries such as manufacturing, distribution, retail, hospitality, and healthcare. Tresha is the founder and principal consultant of HR C-Suite, LLC (www.hrcsuite.com). HR C-Suite is a results-based HR strategy resource dedicated to connecting HR with business results. She has received a master’s degree in human resource management (MS) and a master’s degree in business administration (MBA). She has also earned a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), Six Sigma Black Belt Professional (SSBBP) Certification. She is also recognized as a Fellow with the American College Healthcare Executives with a FACHE designation.

Spread the love